The social and economic diversity of the coffee-banana farming system and technology uptake in Central Uganda

The social and economic diversity of the coffee-banana farming system and technology uptake in Central Uganda

Samuel Mpiira1, 2, 5, Phoebe Mose2, Mary Kipsat2, Christopher Sebatta4, Francis Kalyango1, Wilberforce Tushemereirwe1, Charles Staver3

1National Agricultural Research Organisation, P.O. Box 7065, Kampala Uganda; 2Maseno University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, School of Agriculture and Food Security, Kisumu, Kenya; 3Bioversity International, P. O.  Box 24384, Kampala, Uganda; 4Makerere University, Department of Agribusiness & Natural Resource Economics, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala Uganda; 5Buvuma District Local Government, P.O. Box 103, Lugazi Uganda

Food systems of the future that will guarantee food and nutrition security of millions of poor farming households will have to be both economically and socially diverse. Diversity of farming systems acts as a catalyst for innovation, commercialisation as well as technology adoption. This study sought to find farm typologies and explore the social, enterprise and economic diversity of the various farm types based on a promoted Growing Bananas with Trees and Livestock (GBTL) technology system that was implemented by National Agricultural Research Organisation and Bioversity International in three districts of Central Uganda, Kiboga, Nakaseke and Ssembabule.  Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Cluster Analysis (CA), typologies were created in which two distinct clusters of farming households were revealed. Further analysis of the clusters through Food Consumption Scores, food classes, and other descriptive statistics indicated that the two clusters were socially and economically diverse. Findings indicated that Cluster 1 is made up of smaller farms with high crop diversity. Families in Cluster 1 sell more of their produce and subsequently have lower food security compared to the land-abundant, off-farm earning and more food secure Cluster 2. We failed to reject the hypothesis that socially and economically diverse farmers adopt technologies more given that the level of GBTL adoption was about 25% and about 70% for Banana + Goats within both clusters.

Keywords: Enterprise diversity; Food security; Farm typologies; Uganda

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:

Samuel Mpiira, Phoebe Mose, Mary Kipsat, Christopher Sebatta, Francis Kalyango, Wilberforce Tushemereirwe, Charles Staver. The social and economic diversity of the coffee-banana farming system and technology adoption in Central Uganda. American Journal of Agricultural Research, 2021; 6:108. DOI: 10.28933/ajar-2020-11-2605


1. Abay, K. A., Berhane, G., Taffesse, A. S., Koru, B., & Abay, K. (2016). Understanding farmers’ technology adoption decisions: Input complementarity and heterogeneity.
2. Achonga, B. O., Akuja, T. E., Kimatu, J. N., & Lagat, J. K. (2015). Implications of crop and livestock enterprise diversity on household food security and farm incomes in the Sub Saharan region. Glob Inst Res Educ, 4(2), 125-9.
3. Achonga, B. O., Lagat, J. K., & Akuja, T. E. (2011). Evaluation of the diversity of crop and livestock enterprises among agro-biodiversity farmer field schools (ABD-FFS) and non-ABD-FFS households in Bondo District, Kenya. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 38, 2496-2507.
4. Altieri, M. A., & Toledo, V. M. (2011). The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(3), 587-612.
5. Alvarez, S., Paas, W., Descheemaeker, K., & Groot, J. Constructing typologies, a way to deal with farm diversity: General guideline for Humidtropics [Draft version for SRT1-workshop, 11-13 March 2014, Nairobi].
6. Andersen, E., Elbersen, B., Godeschalk, F., & Verhoog, D. (2007). Farm management indicators and farm typologies as a basis for assessments in a changing policy environment. Journal of environmental management, 82(3), 353-362.
7. Asfaw, A., & Admassie, A. (2004). The role of education on the adoption of chemical fertiliser under different socioeconomic environments in Ethiopia. Agricultural economics, 30(3), 215-228.
8. Bacon, C. M., Getz, C., Kraus, S., Montenegro, M., & Holland, K. (2012). The social dimensions of sustainability and change in diversified farming systems. Ecology and Society, 17(4).
9. Bold, T., Kaizzi, K., Svensson, J., & Yanagizawa-Drott, D. (2015). Low quality, low returns, low adoption: evidence from the market for fertilizer and hybrid seed in Uganda. London, England: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
10. Bongers, G., Jassogne, L., Wanyama, I., Nibasumba, A., Mukasa, D., & van Asten, P. (2012, July). Understanding and exploring the evolution of coffee-banana farming systems in Uganda. In Proceedings of the tenth European IFSA Symposiums (pp. 1-4).
11. Buyinza, M., Banana, A. Y., Nabanoga, G., & Ntakimye, A. (2008). Socio-economic determinants of farmers\’adoption of rotational woodlot technology in Kgorobya Sub-County, Hoima District, Uganda. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension, 37, 1-16.
12. Childers, D. L., Corman, J., Edwards, M., & Elser, J. J. (2011). Sustainability challenges of phosphorus and food: solutions from closing the human phosphorus cycle. Bioscience, 61(2), 117-124.
13. Cornish, P. S., Choudhury, A., Kumar, A., Das, S., Kumbakhar, K., Norrish, S., & Kumar, S. (2015). Improving crop production for food security and improved livelihoods on the East India Plateau II. Crop options, alternative cropping systems and capacity building. Agricultural Systems, 137, 180-190.
14. De Graaff, J., Amsalu, A., Bodnar, F., Kessler, A., Posthumus, H., & Tenge, A. (2008). Factors influencing adoption and continued use of long-term soil and water conservation measures in five developing countries. Applied Geography, 28(4), 271-280.
15. Dossa, L. H., Abdulkadir, A., Amadou, H., Sangare, S., & Schlecht, E. (2011). Exploring the diversity of urban and peri-urban agricultural systems in Sudano-Sahelian West Africa: An attempt towards a regional typology. Landscape and urban planning, 102(3), 197-206.
16. Ellis, F. (1999). Rural livelihood diversity in developing countries: evidence and policy implications (Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 1-10). London: Overseas Development Institute.
17. Errington, A. (2002). Handing over the reins: A comparative study of intergenerational farm transfers in England, France and Canada (No. 723-2016-48847).
18. Evenson, R. E., & Gollin, D. (2003). Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. science, 300(5620), 758-762.
19. FAO (2018). The State of Food and Agriculture 2018. Migration, agriculture and rural development. Rome.
20. FAO/WFP (2008). Interagency Workshop Report WFP – FAO Measures of Food Consumption – Harmonizing Methodologies,Rome, 9 – 10 April 2008
21. Feder, G., Murgai, R., & Quizon, J. B. (2004). The acquisition and diffusion of knowledge: The case of pest management training in farmer field schools, Indonesia. Journal of agricultural economics, 55(2), 221-243.
22. Galdeano-Gómez, E., Pérez-Mesa, J. C., & Godoy-Durán, Á. (2016). The social dimension as a driver of sustainable development: The case of family farms in southeast Spain. Sustainability Science, 11(2), 349-362.
23. Gangwar, B., & Ravishankar, N. S. N. (2016). Farming system approach to meet the challenges from extreme weather.MAUSAM, 67,1:15-26.
24. Ghadim, A. K. A., Pannell, D. J., & Burton, M. P. (2005). Risk, uncertainty, and learning in adoption of a crop innovation. Agricultural economics, 33(1), 1-9.
25. Goswami, R., Chatterjee, S., & Prasad, B. (2014). Farm types and their economic characterization in complex agro-ecosystems for informed extension intervention: study from coastal West Bengal, India. Agricultural and Food Economics, 2(1), 5.
26. Herrero, M., Thornton, P. K., Notenbaert, A. M., Wood, S., Msangi, S., Freeman, H. A., … & Lynam, J. (2010). Smart investments in sustainable food production: revisiting mixed crop-livestock systems. Science, 327(5967), 822-825.
27. 2011.582947
28. Kalavathi, S., Krishnakumar, V. P., Thomas, R. J., Thomas, G. V., & George, M. L. (2010). Improving food and nutritional security of small and marginal coconut growers through diversification of crops and enterprises. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS), 111(2), 101-109.
29. Katungi, E. M. (2007). Social capital and technology adoption on small farms: The case of banana production technology in Uganda (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).
30. Keyzer, M., & Phimister, E. (2003, April). Cooperative gains in agricultural succession. In Contribution présentée à la conférence de l’Agricultural Economics Society, Plymouth, Royaume-Uni.
31. Kremen, C., Iles, A., & Bacon, C. (2012). Diversified farming systems: an agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecology and society, 17(4).
32. Lapar, M., & Ehui, S. K. (2003). Adoption of dual purpose forages: Some policy implications. Tropical grasslands.
33. Padmaja, R., Bantilan, M. C. S., Parthasarathy, D., & Gandhi, B. V. J. (2006). Gender and social capital mediated technology adoption. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT),, (12), 1-52.
34. Righi, E., Dogliotti, S., Stefanini, F. M., & Pacini, G. C. (2011). Capturing farm diversity at regional level to up-scale farm level impact assessment of sustainable development options. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 142(1-2), 63-74.
35. Sebatta, C., Mugisha, J., Bagamba, F., Nuppenau, E. A., Domptail, S. E., Kowalski, B., … & Karungi, J. (2019). Pathways to sustainable intensification of the coffee-banana agroecosystems in the Mt. Elgon region. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 5(1), 1611051.
36. Somda, J., Kamuanga, M., & Tollens, E. (2005). Characteristics and economic viability of milk production in the smallholder farming systems in The Gambia. Agricultural systems, 85(1), 42-58.
37. Sserunkuuma, D. (2005). The adoption and impact of improved maize and land management technologies in Uganda. eJADE: electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, 2(853-2016-56118), 67-84.
38. Thomas, D., Zerbini, E., Rao, P. P., & Vaidyanathan, A. (2002). Increasing animal productivity on small mixed farms in South Asia: a systems perspective. Agricultural Systems, 71(1-2), 41-57.
39. Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D’Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., … & Swackhamer, D. (2001). Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. science, 292(5515), 281
a. -284.
40. Tittonell, P., Muriuki, A., Shepherd, K. D., Mugendi, D., Kaizzi, K. C., Okeyo, J., … & Vanlauwe, B. (2010). The diversity of rural livelihoods and their influence on soil fertility in agricultural systems of East Africa–A typology of smallholder farms. Agricultural systems, 103(2), 83-97.
41. van Asten, P. J., Wairegi, L. W. I., Mukasa, D., & Uringi, N. O. (2011). Agronomic and economic benefits of coffee–banana intercropping in Uganda’s smallholder farming systems. Agricultural systems, 104(4), 326-334.
42. WFP (2015). Food Consumption Score Nutritional Quality Analysis Guidelines (FCS-N)
43. Zorom, M., Barbier, B., Mertz, O., & Servat, E. (2013). Diversification and adaptation strategies to climate variability: A farm typology for the Sahel. Agricultural Systems, 116, 7-15.

Terms of Use/Privacy Policy/ Disclaimer/ Other Policies:
You agree that by using our site, you have read, understood, and agreed to be bound by all of our terms of use/privacy policy/ disclaimer/ other policies (click here for details). This site cannot and does not contain professional advice. The information on this site is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Accordingly, before taking any actions based upon such information, we encourage you to consult with the appropriate professionals. We do not provide any kind of professional advice. The use or reliance of any information contained on this site or our mobile application is solely at your own risk. Under no circumstance shall we have any liability to you for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of the site or our mobile application or reliance on any information provided on the site and our mobile application. We may publish articles without peer-review. Published articles of authors are open access. Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors are solely responsible for their articles published in our journals. Publication of any information in authors’ articles does not constitute an endorsement by us. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability or completeness of any information that authors provided. more..

CC BY 4.0
This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.