Effect of adding graded levels of lablab forages on fermentation characteristics of Brachiaria silage

Effect of adding graded levels of lablab forages on fermentation characteristics of Brachiaria silage

Nviiri Geofrey1*, Okello Horace1, Turyagyenda F., Laban1

1Ngetta Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute, P.O. Box 52, Lira, Uganda

Ensiling as a method of forage feed conservation is the most appropriate in conserving of crude protein (CP) enhanced forages for sustainable dairy production. This is attributed to the fact that with this method, protein dependent lactic acid bacteria (LAB) hydrolyze water soluble carbohydrates (WSC) into short chain volatile fatty acids (VFAs) which are precursors for milk synthesis while the proteins buffers the excessive organic acids to produce more acetate and propionate. The study therefore aimed at assessing the quality of Brachiaria silage which was protein supplemented with graded levels of lablab forage. To achieve this objective, wilted Brachiaria forage (Brachiaria hybrid cv Mulato II) was collected, wilted and ensiled with and Lablab purpureus forages at inclusion levels of 0%, 10%, 20%, 30% Lablab purpureus forage.  The resultant 4 treatments were assessed in a completely randomized design in 3 replicates. All silages were prepared using plastic jar mini-silos to laboratory scale and then incubated at room temperature (±30°C) for 45 days. After the 45 days, chemical analysis for quantification of water soluble carbohydrate (WSC), none protein nitrogen (NH3-N), Acid detergent fiber (ADF), Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), pH, in-vitro organic matter digestibility (INVOMD), acetic acid, lactic acid and propionic acid composition were conducted. The results indicated that; none protein nitrogen, acetic acid and propionic acid composition decreased in quadratic trends with increasing legume forage inclusion to minimum values of 5.8, 48.0 and 0.7g/kg at 14.7, 1.8 and 6.0% inclusion levels of lablab forage, respectively. On the other hand, following a quadratic trend, WSC composition decreased with increase in lablab forage, with a maximum of 28.9g/kg obtained at 7.6% inclusion level of lablab forage. Generally, CP, dry matter, INVOMD and metabolizable energy of the silage increased with increase in the inclusion levels of lablab silage. Using regression equations of the response curves, NDF and ADF decreased with increasing legume forage inclusion to minimum values of 349.3 and 172.1g/kg at inclusion levels of 16.1 and 17.1%, respectively. On the other hand in-vitro organic matter digestibility increased with the increase in the lablab forage inclusion to a maximum of 49.4%. However, mineral composition of the silage was not affected by lablab forage inclusion. Since the quality of silage for dairy cows depends on short chain volatile fatty acid, fibre and crude protein composition, inclusion of lablab forage to Brachiaria hybrid cv mulato II silage at a rate of 17.1% potentially yields the best results in lactating cows.

Keywords: Brachiaria hybrid cv mulato, silage, fermentation characteristics, lablab forage

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:

Nviiri Geofrey, Okello Horace, Turyagyenda F., Laban. Effect of adding graded levels of lablab forages on fermentation characteristics of Brachiaria silage. American Journal of Agricultural Research. AJAR, 2021; 6:112. DOI: 10.28933/AJAR-2020-11-1205


1. Aganga, A. A., and S. O. Tshwenyane. “Lucerne, Lablab and Leucaena leucocephala forages: production and utilization for livestock production.” Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 2, no. 2 (2003): 46-53.
2. Falade, Olumuyiwa S., Olusoga R. Sowunmi, Adewale Oladipo, Ayo Tubosun, and Steve RA Adewusi. “The level of organic acids in some Nigerian fruits and their effect on mineral availability in composite diets.” Pak. J. Nutr 2, no. 2 (2003): 82-83.
3. FAO, FAOSTAT. “FAO Statistical Data.” (2004).
4. Henderson, Nancy. “Silage additives.” Animal Feed Science and Technology 45, no. 1 (1993): 35-56.
5. Geofrey, Nviiri, Okello Horace, Turyagyenda Laban, Kigozi Abasi, and Mugerwa Swidiq. “Periodic Variations of Lablab purpureus Productivity Harvested at Different Growth Stages: A Case Study in Mid Northern Uganda. International Journal of Science and Research Volume 8 Issue 6, (2019).
6. Kabirizi, Jolly, Emma Ziiwa, Swidiq Mugerwa, Jean Ndikumana, and William Nanyennya. “Dry season forages for improving dairy production in smallholder systems in Uganda.” Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales 1, no. 2 (2013): 212-214.
7. Kammes, K. L., G. B. H. Heemink, K. A. Albrecht, and D. K. Combs. “Utilization of kura clover-reed canarygrass silage versus alfalfa silage by lactating dairy cows.” Journal of dairy science 91, no. 8 (2008): 3138-3144.
8. Kato, H., F. B. Bareeba, C. Ebong, and E. Sabiiti. “Fermentation characteristics and nutrient composition of browses ensiled with maize fodder.” African Crop Science Journal 12, no. 4 (2004): 393-400.
9. Kung Jr, Limin. “Understanding the biology of silage preservation to maximize quality and protect the environment.” In Proceedings, 2010 California Alfalfa & Forage Symposium and Corn/Cereal Silage Conference, pp. 1-2. 2010.
10. Li, Yanbing, and Naoki Nishino. “Effects of ensiling fermentation and aerobic deterioration on the bacterial community in italian ryegrass, guinea grass, and whole-crop maize silages stored at high moisture content.” Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences 26, no. 9 (2013): 1304.
11. Manyawu, G. J., S. Sibanda, C. Mutisi, I. C. Chakoma, and P. N. B. Ndiweni. “The effect of pre-wilting and incorporation of maize meal on the fermentation of Bana grass silage.” Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences 16, no. 6 (2003): 843-851.
12. Menardo, Simona, Paolo Balsari, Ernesto Tabacco, and Giorgio Borreani. “Effect of conservation time and the addition of lactic acid bacteria on the biogas and methane production of corn stalk silage.” BioEnergy Research 8, no. 4 (2015): 1810-1823.
13. Murphy, Andrea M., and Pablo E. Colucci. “A tropical forage solution to poor quality ruminant diets: A review of Lablab purpureus.” Livestock Research for Rural Development 11, no. 2 (1999): 1999.
14. Nviiri, Geofrey, H. Okello, P. Nakyewa, and G. A. Maiteki. “Extent of availability of major nutrients from selected Cereal Crop Residues to dairy ruminants as an alternative Dry Season Forage in Northern Uganda.” Journal of Advances in Agriculture, 4 1 (2014).
15. Ridwan, Roni, Iman Rusmana, Yantyati Widyastuti, Komang G. Wiryawan, Bambang Prasetya, Mitsuo Sakamoto, and Moriya Ohkuma. “Fermentation characteristics and microbial diversity of tropical grass-legumes silages.” Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences 28, no. 4 (2015): 511.
16. Sas, S. A. S., and STAT User’S. Guide. “Version 9.1.” SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC (2003).
17. Seglar, Bill. “Fermentation analysis and silage quality testing.” (2003).
18. Sibanda, S., R. M. Jingura, and J. H. Topps. “The effect of level of inclusion of the legume Desmodium uncinatum and the use of molasses or ground maize as additives on the chemical composition of grass-and maize-legume silages.” Animal Feed Science and Technology 68, no. 3-4 (1997): 295-305.
19. Tiemann, Tassilo T., Carlos E. Lascano, H-R. Wettstein, Andrea Corina Mayer, Michael Kreuzer, and Hans Dieter Hess. “Effect of the tropical tannin-rich shrub legumes Calliandra calothyrsus and Flemingia macrophylla on methane emission and nitrogen and energy balance in growing lambs.” Animal 2, no. 5 (2008): 790-799.
20. Titterton, M., and F. B. Bareeba. “Grass and legume silages in the tropics.” FAO Plant Production and Protection Papers (2000): 43-50.
21. Tyrolová, Y., and A. Výborná. “The effects of wilting and biological and chemical additives on the fermentation process in field pea silage.” Czech Journal of Animal Science 56, no. 10 (2011): 427-432.
22. Van Soest, PJ van, J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lewis. “Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.” Journal of dairy science 74, no. 10 (1991): 3583-3597.
23. Wright, D. A., F. J. Gordon, R. W. J. Steen, and D. C. Patterson. “Factors influencing the response in intake of silage and animal performance after wilting of grass before ensiling: a review.” Grass and Forage Science 55, no. 1 (2000): 1-13.

Terms of Use/Privacy Policy/ Disclaimer/ Other Policies:
You agree that by using our site, you have read, understood, and agreed to be bound by all of our terms of use/privacy policy/ disclaimer/ other policies (click here for details). This site cannot and does not contain professional advice. The information on this site is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Accordingly, before taking any actions based upon such information, we encourage you to consult with the appropriate professionals. We do not provide any kind of professional advice. The use or reliance of any information contained on this site or our mobile application is solely at your own risk. Under no circumstance shall we have any liability to you for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of the site or our mobile application or reliance on any information provided on the site and our mobile application. We may publish articles without peer-review. Published articles of authors are open access. Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors are solely responsible for their articles published in our journals. Publication of any information in authors’ articles does not constitute an endorsement by us. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability or completeness of any information that authors provided. more..

CC BY 4.0
This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.