Evaluating the Potential for Improved and Sustainable Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Northern Namibia

Evaluating the Potential for Improved and Sustainable Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Northern Namibia

David Ifeanyi Uchezuba1* & Salom Mbai2

1Senior Lecturer Namibian University of Science and Technology, Department of Agriculture and Natural Resource Sciences, Tel. +264810425716
2Lecturer Namibia University of Science and Technology, Department of Agriculture and Natural Resource Sciences, Tel. +264813902376

The study evaluated the potential for improved and sustainable adoption of conservation agriculture in five regions in Namibia namely, Omusati, Kunene, Oshikoto, Ohangwena, and Oshana. Conventional system of farming involves, monoculture and deep soil tillage with ox-drawn ploughs with limited mechanisation. These practices are unproductive and unsustainable given increased uncertainty due to climate change.Therefore, conservation agriculture was introduced in the regions through the Food and Agricultural Organisation’s (FAO) assisted programme. The aim of the programme was to lower vulnerability by increasing the resilience of the smallholder farmers in the selected regions to adapt to climate change risks through the implementation of Conservation Agriculture (CA) and other complementary Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs).

The hypothesis is that increased CA knowledge would enhance improved outcomes. An empirical estimation of the relationship between the farmers learned CA skills, and the level of CA outcome was carried out using econometrics method. One hundred and forty-four farmers were sampled from the selected regions. The result indicates that additional CA knowledge may result in farmers’ improving their General Agricultural Practices. In order words, farmers are more likely to improve weeding than not, the area planted is more likely to increase than decrease and fertilizer application is more likely to increase significantly than not. There is an increase in the ordered log-odds of moving from a lower to a higher outcome level. For instance, a one-unit increase in the farmers’ CA knowledge will result in 0.05 unit increase in ordered log-odds of being in the higher category for the ‘area planted’ outcome variable while the other variables in the model are held constant. The same relationship applies to other outcome variables for farmers’ improved knowledge. In addition, the sustainability of the CA project was investigated. Using a probit probability choice model, it was found that CA adoption will increase in the future in these regions. The result shows that farmers are willing to adopt CA and continue practising it on the condition that benefits such as increased yield, training and household consumption are guaranteed. This is because, increased yield, training and household consumption increased the probability that farmers will continue CA adoption.

Keywords: Conservation agriculture; Good agricultural practice; Adoption; Drought; Willingness; Minimal tillage; Soil fertility

Free Full-text PDF

How to cite this article:

David Ifeanyi Uchezuba, Salom Mbai. Evaluating the Potential for Improved and Sustainable Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Northern Namibia. American Journal of Agricultural Research, 2020; 5:106. DOI: 10.28933/ajar-2020-07-2905


1. R, Brant. Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds models for ordinal logistics regression. Biometrics. Vol. (46) 1990: 117-1178.
2. Chan, Catherine, Brent Sipes, Abouzeid Ayman, Xu Zhang, Patricia LaPorte, Fellipe Fernandes, Aliza Pradhan, Jacqueline Chan-Dentoni, and Pravat Roul. ‘Efficiency of Conservation Agriculture Production Systems for Smallholders in Rain-Fed Uplands of India: A Transformative Approach to Food Security’. Land Vol 6 (3) 2017 https://doi.org/10.3390/land6030058.
3. Dumanski, Julian, Eugene Terry, Derek Byerlee, and Christian Pieri. Performance Indicators for Sustainable Agriculture October 1998. Rural Development Sector, October 1998: 2–18.
4. Food and Agricultural Organisation. Final Evaluation of the Conservation Agriculture Scaling-up Project Funded by the European Union. September.2018
5. Food and Agricultural Organisation. Conservation Agriculture 2017. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203932698.ch15.
6. Ghaley, Bhim Bahadur, Teodor Rusu, Taru Sandén, Heide Spiegel, Cristina Menta, Giovanna Visioli, Lilian O’Sullivan ‘Assessment of Benefits of Conservation Agriculture on Soil Functions in Arable Production Systems in Europe. Sustainability (Switzerland) Vol (3) 2018.https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030794.
7. N. Gilbert. ‘Dirt Poor: The Key to Tackling Hunger in Africa Is Enriching Its Soil. The Big Debate Is How to Do It.’ Nature 483 2012: 525–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/cind.8010_9.x.
8. K.E, Giller, Ken., Jens. Andersson, Marc Corbeels, John Kirkegaard, David Mortensen, Olaf Erenstein, and Bernard Vanlauwe. ‘Beyond Conservation Agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science 6 (OCTOBER) 2015.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00870.
9. G. Williams and D.A. Henscher. Modelling ordered choices. Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, NY 10012 2009
10. Hobbs, Peter, Ken Sayre, and Raj Gupta. The Role of Conservation Agriculture in Sustainable Agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences Vol 363 (1491) 2008: 543–55.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2169.
11. Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. Climate Change, Disaster Risk, and the Urban Poor 2012. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8845-7.
12. Kabirigi, Musana, Ngetich, Mugwe, Mukuralinda, Nabahungu, ( Ku, and Kenya Nairobi. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management Applicability of Conservation Agriculture for Climate Change Adaptation in Rwanda’s Situation Vol 6 (9) 2015: 241–48. https://doi.org/10.5897/JSSEM15.0508.
13. Kassam, Friedrich, Shaxson, Bartz, Mello, Kienzle & Pretty.The Spread of Conservation Agriculture 2014: Policy and Institutional Support for Adoption and Uptake. Field Actions Science Reports Vol 7 (April 2019): 0–12.
14. Kerdiles, Hervé, Felix Rembold, and Ana Pérez-hoyos. Seasonal Monitoring in Namibia in Northern and Central Namibia. Technical Report European Union Commission 2015
15. Lai, Cynthia, Catherine Chan, Jacqueline Halbrendt, Linsey Shariq, Pravat Roul, Travis Idol, Chittanrajan Ray, and Carl Evensen. 2012. Comparative Economic and Gender, Labor Analysis of Conservation Agriculture Practices in Tribal Villages in India. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review Vol 15 (1): 73–86.
16. Long, Scott, and Jeremy Freese. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using STATA. Sociology The Journal Of The British Sociological Association. Vol. Revised ed. https://doi.org/10.1186/2051-3933-2-4, 2001
17. M. Buis. OPARALLEL Stata module providing post-estimation command for testing the parallel regression assumption; Statistical Software Components S457720, Boston College Department of Economics USA, 2013.
18. Marongwe, Lungowe Sepo, Isaiah Nyagumbo, Karsto Kwazira, Amir Kassam, and Theodor Friedrich. Conservation Agriculture and Sustainable Crop Intensification: A Zimbabwe Case Study. Integrated Crop Management. Vol. 15.2012
19. MRLGHRD. Flood Risk Management Plan .2011
20. Namibian Meteorological Service. Annual Rainfall estimates 2019.
21. Namibia Statistics Agency.Poverty Dynamics in Namibia: NHIES Surveys. 2012 https://d3rp5jatom3eyn.cloudfront.net/cms/assets/documents/p19dnar71kanl1vfo14gu5rpbkq1.pdf.
22. Namibia Statistics Agency. Namibian Population Projection 2014: 2011-2041.
23. Namibia Statistics Agency Namibian Land Statistics, September 2018: 1–48.https://nsa.org.na/.
24. Namibia Statistics Agency. Namibia Inter-Censal Demographic Survey 2016 Report, 1–136. https://nsa.org.na/.
25. Namibia Statistics Agency.Namibian 2011 Census: Migration Report 2015 https://nsa.org.na/.
26. Namibia Statistics Agency.The Namibia Labour Force Survey 2019 Report.
27. Nkala, Peter. Assessing the Impacts of Conservation Agriculture on Farmer Livelihoods in Three Selected Communities in Central Mozambique. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, May 2012
28. Thierfelder, Christian, Stephanie Cheesman, and Leonard Rusinamhodzi. A Comparative Analysis of Conservation Agriculture Systems: Benefits and Challenges of Rotations and Intercropping in Zimbabwe. Field Crops Research Vol 137, 2012: 237–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.08.017.
29. Tilman, David, Christian Balzer, Jason Hill, and Belinda Befort.Global Food Demand and the Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Vol 108 (50) 2011: 20260–64.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108.
30. Vanlauwe, Coyne, Gockowski, Hauser, M.Huising, Masso, Nziguheba, Schut, and Van Asten. Sustainable Intensification of the African Smallholder. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability Vol 8 2014: 15–22.

Terms of Use/Privacy Policy/ Disclaimer/ Other Policies:
You agree that by using our site, you have read, understood, and agreed to be bound by all of our terms of use/privacy policy/ disclaimer/ other policies (click here for details). This site cannot and does not contain professional advice. The information on this site is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Accordingly, before taking any actions based upon such information, we encourage you to consult with the appropriate professionals. We do not provide any kind of professional advice. The use or reliance of any information contained on this site or our mobile application is solely at your own risk. Under no circumstance shall we have any liability to you for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of the site or our mobile application or reliance on any information provided on the site and our mobile application. We may publish articles without peer-review. Published articles of authors are open access. Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors are solely responsible for their articles published in our journals. Publication of any information in authors’ articles does not constitute an endorsement by us. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability or completeness of any information that authors provided. more..

CC BY 4.0
This work and its PDF file(s) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.